IBM

IBM’s AI will debate until you learn your mistakes, feeble human

ibm project debater dan zafrir ai
Project Debater with President of the International Debate Society, Dan Zafrir

IBM has unveiled Project Debater, a conversational artificial intelligence which can hold a debate using information from journals and newspaper articles.

Project Debater began its training six years ago but it could only hold a debate with people two years ago. A demo was held for journalists at IBM’s offices in San Francisco where the AI debated issues relating to healthcare and the subsidisation of space exploration.

The company didn’t give its AI an easy time either – it was competing against Dan Zafrir, President of the International Debate Society in Israel, and 2016 national Israel debate champion Noa Ovadia.

Debater opened its supporting argument for space exploration subsidisation with facts such as how it benefits humankind because it helps advance scientific discoveries and inspires young people to think beyond themselves.

Ovadia countered the argument saying there are better applications for government subsidies, including for scientific research here on Earth.

The AI considered Ovadia’s argument before delivering a rebuttal that potential technological and economic benefits from space exploration outweigh other government spending.

According to IBM, aside from opening remarks and jokes, none of the debates were scripted.

Following the debate, a poll showed the majority of audience members thought Project Debater enriched their knowledge more than its human counterpart.

Politicians have gained somewhat of a reputation for using arguments without factual basis in debates to support their campaigns. Short of their opponent being prepared to counter it, the argument can be seen as true. It’s easy to see where an AI like Project Debater could one day act as a mediator in these circumstances to ensure points are not misleading.

If nothing else, Project Debater would be great for training for any form of public speaking to ensure the arguments are factual and prepare for any potential rebukes to avoid embarrassment.

Heck, it could even be used privately to challenge some of our own views following potential exposure to politicians’ lies, “fake news”, and propaganda bots.

What are your thoughts on IBM’s Project Debater AI? Let us know in the comments.

Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

To Top

Privacy Preference Center

We are using cookies on our website

We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features, and to analyse our traffic. Please confirm if you accept our tracking cookies. You are free to decline the tracking so you can continue to visit our website without any data sent to third-party services. All personal data can be deleted by visiting the Contact Us > Privacy Tools area of the website.